[
  {
    "id": "example_excluded_private_screenshot",
    "type": "excluded",
    "title": "Private screenshot without public source",
    "category": "Other source-backed civil rights event",
    "affected_communities": ["Religion"],
    "confidence": "Low",
    "verification_status": "Verified from public source",
    "source_basis": "No public source URL is available for independent record review.",
    "methodological_point": "Private screenshots are excluded unless independently supported by public source material.",
    "public_claim_limit": "This example does not describe a published event record or external review outcome."
  },
  {
    "id": "example_downgraded_single_source",
    "type": "downgraded",
    "title": "Single public source with limited details",
    "category": "Harassment or threat",
    "affected_communities": ["Jewish"],
    "confidence": "Medium",
    "verification_status": "Verified from public source",
    "source_basis": "One public source supports the core record, but date precision and institutional response detail are limited.",
    "methodological_point": "A record can be included while confidence remains below High because source support is limited.",
    "public_claim_limit": "This example must not be used as proof of prevalence, severity, intent, or institutional fault."
  },
  {
    "id": "example_limited_response_note",
    "type": "limited",
    "title": "Public response date with limited response text",
    "category": "Institutional response",
    "affected_communities": ["Israeli", "Jewish"],
    "confidence": "High",
    "verification_status": "Verified from public source",
    "source_basis": "The public source supports a response date and procedural posture, but not a complete independent response assessment.",
    "methodological_point": "Limited response notes should be visible as words while avoiding claims that the response was evaluated.",
    "public_claim_limit": "This example must not be used to claim that Campus Evidence Lab judged the institution's completed response."
  },
  {
    "id": "example_correction_ready_public_source",
    "type": "correction_ready",
    "title": "Correction request with public source support",
    "category": "OCR complaint",
    "affected_communities": ["Students with disabilities"],
    "confidence": "High",
    "verification_status": "Verified from public source",
    "source_basis": "A public government case summary identifies a field that could correct or narrow an event record.",
    "methodological_point": "Corrections should identify the record field, requested change, and public source basis before publication.",
    "public_claim_limit": "This example does not mean the correction is accepted until the public review workflow records a decision."
  },
  {
    "id": "example_source_audit_risk",
    "type": "source_audit_risk",
    "title": "Source URL requires follow-up",
    "category": "Vandalism",
    "affected_communities": ["Race"],
    "confidence": "Medium",
    "verification_status": "Verified from public source",
    "source_basis": "The record was source-backed, but the latest live audit indicates the source URL may need replacement or archival context.",
    "methodological_point": "Source-audit risk is a maintenance signal and should not be converted into a claim about record truth.",
    "public_claim_limit": "This example must not be used to imply that the event did or did not occur."
  },
  {
    "id": "example_broad_label_review",
    "type": "broad_label_review",
    "title": "Broad affected-community label needs review",
    "category": "Title IX compliance",
    "affected_communities": ["Gender"],
    "confidence": "Medium",
    "verification_status": "Verified from public source",
    "source_basis": "The public source supports a broad sex or gender-related label but does not safely support a narrower community label.",
    "methodological_point": "Broad labels should remain visible for review and should be narrowed only when public source text supports narrowing.",
    "public_claim_limit": "This example must not be used to infer motive, individual experience, or group-specific prevalence."
  }
]