Acknowledgments

No public acknowledgments yet.

This page is reserved for documented reviewers, collaborators, and organizations after their scope of review is clear. It does not list prospects, outreach targets, or informal encouragement.

Current Status

No public partners, reviewers, or organizational collaborators are currently claimed.

Acknowledgment Criteria

• The reviewer or organization completed a documented review, audit, brief review, or collaboration.
• The public acknowledgment describes the scope of work accurately.
• The reviewer or organization agreed to the public display name.
• The acknowledgment does not imply endorsement unless the reviewer explicitly authorizes that language.

Future Categories

Methodology reviewer

Reviewed rules for inclusion, exclusion, source hierarchy, confidence, verification, deduplication, privacy, or no-ranking language.

Source audit reviewer

Checked source URLs, publishers, dates, source types, or source-to-record fit for a documented sample.

Research reviewer

Reviewed a public brief, research guide language, or a narrow research question for overclaiming risk.

Organizational collaborator

Worked on a defined public artifact, review process, dataset improvement, or outreach effort with documented scope.

Policy

The full policy is published in docs/partner-acknowledgment-policy.md. The review path starts with the Trust & Review Packet.